QuadroFX vs FireGL X1

<img src="http://www.sweclockers.com/img/ico_note.gif"><b class="red">QuadroFX vs FireGL X1</b> <small class="small">Skrivet Lördag, 8 Februari, 2003 av <a href="mailto:herman@sweclockers.com">Herman</a><br /></small>
<a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/video/3dsmax5-quadrofx/">X-Bit Labs</a> har gjort en gigantisk jämförelse mellan Nvidias nya QuadroFX och ATIs FireGL X1. Den spänner över 6 stora sidor och varje prestanda- och kvalitetsaspekt tas upp. För er som är mer intresserad av något av dessa kort skulle jag vilja kalla denna jämförelse den ultimata artikeln.<br><br><I>Well, once again following its good old traditions, NVIDIA announces the professional version of its recently launched newest NV30graphics chip. The newcomer is known under the NV30GL codename and the first professional graphics chips based on it are called Quadro FX 1000 and Quadro FX 2000.<br><br>As usual, the company marketing people are doing their best to let everyone know that in the new NV30GL they implemented a new revolutionary approach to image displaying in viewports of 3-dimentional applications, that the image quality provided by the new solution is beyond any competition (although we all know very well, that we usually work in the most primitive wireframe and shadowed modes in viewports to speed up the image processing).</I><br><br>Läs hela jämförelsen hos <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/video/3dsmax5-quadrofx/" target="_top" >X-Bit Labs.</a><p>