5900X | CH8 | 64GB/3600MHz | RTX4080 | SN850 | H2O 2*360 Rad | LG CX48 | HE560, Pre Box S2D & Arcam rHead
Färdigbyggd photoshopdator Max 10000
Skrivet av Mordekai:
Det beror ju på vad för något som görs, filter etc. Det framgår heller inte vad detta skulle göra på en iGPU eller en CPU. Dvs ingen kontext.
Och resten av min post lämnade du okommenterad? "OK". Vore kanske mer klädsamt att erkänna att ditt utspel om VRAMs insignifikans samt att Intels iGPU är lika bra som dedikerade GFX inte stämmer.
FYI här test från i våras med nya AI-denoisern, svarar rätt bra på din fråga:
Citat:
Another significant factor in the denoise speed is the amount of memory that the card has. There's a reason why Adobe recommend at least 8GB of GPU memory. A couple of examples:
Citat:
My system has an Intel i7-12700K CPU with 32GB of DDR5 RAM. It has integrated GPU (UHD Graphics 770). It's plenty fast enough for LrC including masking. However, with AI Denoise, the integrated GPU struggles at 4 min 30 sec on a 20MP file.
Like most of us, I would suggest, I'm making more and more use of Denoise. So, I bit the bullet and installed a MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ventus 8GB. After some issues with having two GPUs, which was fixed in BIOS, it now does Denoise on a 20MP file in just 18sec. That's 15x faster. Very happy!
Citat:
Puget Systems still recommend the RTX 3060 Ti 8GB on their website, but as far as I can see, they haven't re-run any of their GPU tests since Adobe dramatically increased the use of the GPU in masking and in particular Denoise AI. I agree with Gnits, that for now, the RTX 4070 12 GB (non Ti) appears to be the sweet-spot for Lightroom/PS, providing some extra power and VRAM compared to the 3060 Ti to future-proof a little longer.
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/community/threads/my-recent-gp...
Visa signatur
Visa signatur
5900X | CH8 | 64GB/3600MHz | RTX4080 | SN850 | H2O 2*360 Rad | LG CX48 | HE560, Pre Box S2D & Arcam rHead
Senast redigerat
Länk till Asrock b760m
Senast redigerat
