Grafikkort till 3D-Program, Archicad

Ska slänga ihop en dator och har en fråga om grafikkort. Jag jobbar i Archicad, som är ett 2D- och 3D-program för arkitekter. Man kan bygga rätt avancerade modeller och plocka ut renderingar. men inte ofta animeringar.
Frågan är om man ska använda gamingkort jag gör en jämförelse, vad skulle ni ta?
1 gamingkort: ASUS GeForce GTX 560Ti 1GB,GDDR5, 900 Mhz,
1849:-
2 CADkort: PNY Quadro FX 580 512MB GDDR3, 400Mhz
1.795:-
Så här skriver tillverkaren:
"Professional" vs. "Gaming" video cards
Graphic card manufacturers typically have different product lines targeted for "gamers" and "professional users". While the hardware setup is very similar in case of both cards, there are key differences in their firmware and driver. "Gamer" cards (such as Nvidia GeForce and Ati Radeon) are optimized for 3D games, where speed is more important than image quality. Typically a 3D model in a game contains a low number of polygons with textures applied to them, while in CAD polygon count is high, and the quality of the still image of the wireframe or shaded model is more important than navigation speed. Also, professional cards' memory usage is optimized for using multiple application windows, while in gaming this is not relevant. Another key difference between the two product lines is the way they are delivered and supported. Professional cards (such as Nvidia Quadro and ATi FireGL) are built according to the video chip manufacturer's references, so you can always be sure that the driver delivered by the video chip manufacturer (e.g. Nvidia or ATI) fits your card. The manufacturers of gaming cards (such as ASUS, Sapphire, Gigabyte, PNY, etc...) may diverge from the chip manufacturer's references, so their drivers may not be compatible with the chip manufacturer's reference driver. Also, the product life cycle and driver release cycles are much shorter in case of gaming cards.

Vad tror ni?