[BF4] Fov buggad, Låg mer effektivt än hög.

Foven har tydligen ändrats en hel del jämfört med hur det var i bf3.

Long story short, Låg fov > hög fov i Battlefield4. Tråkigt att Dice har förbisett detta.
Så i dagens läge ger låg fov en mycket stor fördel jämfört med hög fov, tillräckligt hög för att motivera att sänka den.

Möts två personer med lika bra aim på avstånd så kommer det alltid vara den som kör låg fov som går vinnande ut striden, lite fel tycker jag då det inte var så alls i Battlefield 3.

Låter bilderna tala för sig själva

Battlefield 4
60 Fov
http://i.imgur.com/WpsY31l.png

120 Fov
http://i.imgur.com/59sCOIw.png

Battlefield 3

Ja, dessa bilder är korrekta, det är en demonstration som visar hur det ska fungera.
60 Fov
http://i.imgur.com/AT888Tdh.png

90 Fov
http://i.imgur.com/itR4oCwh.png

Mer bilder och jämförelser: http://imgur.com/a/eIXK3
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/en/forum/threadview/2955...

Ni som inte förstår problematiken här, jag rekommenderar att ni läser ordentligt i denna tråd där de går in på det mer djupgående: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/en/forum/threadview/2955...

Tex denna text beskriver det hela rätt bra:

So, everyone saying this should not be changed has pretty much brought up those arguments:

"Don't whine, high FOV players would be at an advanatge otherwise."

- wrong, you do not have a lot more situational awareness when playing on a high FOV. You DO have more stuff on your screen but at the same time it is much smaller and harder to indentify.
- Also, even though players have used high FOVs to gain advantages in games like Quake and UT with bright colored enemies and no textures on the rest of the map (I was one of them), a high FOV in a slow paced game on giant maps does NOT even compare to those in any way.

"If you don't like it just adapt, lower your FOV and have the best of both worlds"

- Oh I would love to, I don't care about fitting as much of the map on my screen as I can, the problem is I, and many many other PC players, can't play for very long with a FOV lower than 90/100, some even higher than that. We do NOT have the choice to do so. It is simply discriminating against people who get motionsickness easily and/or have a setup where they sit rather close to their monitor. I like my monitor and I would prefer not to puke all over it.

"But, players with a low FOV don't gain an advantage like that!"

- Oh yes they do. It's pretty easy, Joe plays on 60 FOV and uses a RDS. Mike also uses a RDS, but due to easily getting motion sick he has to play on 95 FOV. They both see each other on the battlefield, both are in cover and ADS at the same time. Both Joe and Mike have to compensate for the same amount of recoil with the exact same effort because your actual sight moves the same on both screens. But Joe will easily win this firefight, because he has much more leeway to adjust his sight, he doesn't have to go pixelhunting with his bouncing sight because the enemy is simply bigger on his RDS than on Mike's. Mike is now dead, I hope you realize what you've done...

"Okay, but you can just choose to use a magnifier, a scope with more zoom!"

- Oh no, you can't. I mean you can, but first of all you would have to give up an attachment slot for the magnifier, then there is the problem thatt ALL other sights besides RDS block a lot more of your view and make recoil harder to control. And, the biggest problem here, playing at a high FOV will just screw up ALL sights for you in relation to RDS, the most common sight. RDS is supposed to be 1x, no zoom. But the magnifer(due to having a fixed FOV) will suddenly zoom in 3x maybe even 4x in relation to the RDS, which you are used to. If we go to 3.4x or 4x sights it just gets worse, so no, there is no alternative.

If anyone actually read this, I hope you see now that no one is trying to get an advantage over you, nobody wants to see the whole map on his little screen, realize you are standing behind him and then snipe you with their pistol from accross the map. We just want to enjoy the game, have the same experience as you do and have a fair fight.
And to anyone who plays on a high FOV and enjoys it the way it is right now, let's just make it an option, or get a second FOV slider etc. I also don't want you to lose the experience you like at the moment.

That's it, please consider it again.

Som Tjodd tidigare nämnt i tråden så har jag också hört att de har gjort detta med flit på grund av att vissa sikten fungerar olika i verkligheten och de försökte göra det mer "verkligt". Kom dock inte ihåg argumenten eller varför, men det var något som verkade logiskt när de togs upp i betan

Vet att det ska vara en diskussions tråd på Reddit om det men hittar den inte nu..

Den texten svarar inte alls på varför Fov'en ska ändras till standard när man siktar. Vad är det som säger att det ska vara så? Väljer du att spela på 120 fov så får du väl spela med 120 fov, vill du ha lägre så sänk.

Okej nu fattar jag. Folk tycker att FOV ska vara standard när man använder siktet.

Vad säger att det ska vara så? Är det ett faktum och så det alltid funkat i fps där man kan sikta med siktet?
Är det ett fel/bugg eller är det ett val?

BuggField4 visar mer features

Fattar inte folk att oavsett vilket FOV du kör i spelet, skall det vara samma för alla när man zoomar. ?